‘Stark Raving Sane’: Melancholy as a Form of Fictionality in Hamlet
Keywords:
Shakespeare, Hamlet, Modality, Melancholy, SubjectivityAbstract
No abstract available.Downloads
References
Anon. Haec-Vir, or Womanish Man. London: for I.T[rundle], 1620.
Armand, Louis. ‘Hamlet/Machine’. The Symptom 10. http://www.lacan.com/armandf.htm (2009) [last accessed May 2011].
Ascham, Anthony. A litell treatyse of astronomy. London, 1550.
Barker, Francis. The Tremulous Private Body: Essays on Subjection. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 1995.
Blake, Euphemia Vale. ‘The Impediment of Adipose – A Celebrated Case’, Popular Science Monthly vol. 17 (May 1880): 60-71.
Bloom, Harold. Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. New York: Riverhead, 1998.
Boorde, Andrew. The Breviary of healthe. London, 1552.
Bright, Timothy. A Treatise of Melancholie. 2nd edn. London: Thomas Vautrolier, 1586.
Caius, John. A boke, or conseil, against the disease commonly called the sweate, or sweating Sicknesse. London: Richard Grafton, 1552
Cavell, Stanley. Disowning Knowledge in Seven Plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Dover Wilson, John. What Happens in Hamlet 1935. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.
Edmund, John. Shakespeare Breaks the Illusion’. Critical Enquiry 23 (1981): 3-18.
Elyot, Thomas. The Castel of Helth. 1534. London: TB, 1539
‘Eutheo’ (and Salvian, of Marseilles, ca. 400-ca. 480). A second and third blast of retrait from plaies and theatres. London:
Evans, Dylan. ‘Science and Truth: An Introduction I’ The Symptom 10. http://www. lacan.com/evanshtm (2009) [last accessed May 2011]
Gaskill, Malcolm. Crime and Mentalities in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Gosson, Stephen. Playes Confuted in Fiue Actions. London, 1582.
Gowland, Angus. ‘The Problem of Early Modern melancholy’. Past & Present 191.1 (2006): 77-120
Grady, Hugh. ‘Shakespeare and Impure Aesthetics: The Case of A Midsummer Night’s Dream’. Shakespeare Quarterly 59.3 (2008): 274-302.
—.Shakespeare, Machiavelli and Monatigne: Power and Subjectivity from Richard II to Hamlet. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
de Grazia, Margreta. ‘Hamlet before its Time’. MLQ 62.4 (2001): 355-75.
Hazlitt, William. Lectures on the Literature of the Age of Elizabeth and Characters of Shakespear’s Plays. London : George Bell and Sons, 1900.
Hill, Thomas. The Contemplation of mankinde (reprint of A Brief Epitome of the Whole Art of Physiognomy 1556). London, 1571
Hillman, David. Shakespeare’s Entrails. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007
Hoeniger, F. David. Medicine and Shakespeare in the English Renaissance. Newark: Delaware University Press, 1992.
Jones, Ernest. Hamlet and Oedipus. London: Victor Gollancz LtD, 1949.
Kinney, Arthur F., ed. Hamlet, New Critical Essays London: Routledge, 2002.
Kodera, Sergius, Disreputable Bodies: Magic, Medicine and Gender in Renaissance Natural Philosophy. Toronto: Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies, 2010.
Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 1962. 2nd edn. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1970.
Lacan, Jacques. ‘Desire and the Interpretation of Desire in Hamlet’. 1959. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Trans. James Hulbert. Yale French Studies 55/6. (1977): 11-52.
Levine, Laura. Men in Women’s Clothing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Lewis, David. ‘Truth in Fiction’. American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 15 no. 1 (1978):.37-46.
Mazzio, Carla. ‘Shakespeare and Science, c. 1600’, South Central Review, Volume 26, Numbers 1 & 2 (2009): 1-32.
Monks, Aoife. The Actor in Costume. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
Pippin, Robert. The Persistence of Subjectivity: on the Kantian Aftermath. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2005.
Pope John XXI. The treasury of healthe. London: [?] Coplande, 1553.
Prynne, William. Histriomastix. London: EA and WI, 1633.
Quilligan, Maureen, Margreta de Grazia, and Peter Stallybrass. Subject and Object in Renaissance Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Rank, Otto. http://www.ottorank.com/essays/rank-on-hamlet [last accessed April 2011]
Rankins, William. A Mirror of Monsters. London: 1587
Roach Joseph. The Player’s Passion: Studies in the Science of Acting. 1985. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 1993.
Rossi Alfred. Minneapolis Rehearsals: Tyrone Guthrie Directs Hamlet. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1970.
Sawday, Jonathan. The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Body in Renaissance Culture. London: Routledge, 1995.
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. 1602 (entered in Stationers’ Register). ed. Philip Edwards. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Slights, Jessica, and Paul Yachnin eds. Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance and Theatrical Persons. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
Spiller, Elizabeth, ‘Shakespeare and the Making of Early Modern Science’, South Central Review, Volume 26, Numbers 1 & 2 (2009): 24-41.
Konstantin Stanislavski. An Actor’s Work: A Student’s Diary. 1938. Trans. and ed. Jean Benedetti.London: Routledge, 2008
Stoll, EE. ‘Jaques and the Antiquaries,’ Modern Language Notes 54.2 (1939): 79-85.
Stoppard, Tom. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. 1967. London: Faber and Faber 2000.
Strawson, PF. Individuals. London: Lowe and Brydene, 1959.
Tilmouth, Christopher. Passion’s Triumph Over Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Authors may deposit the Submitted version; Accepted version (Author Accepted Manuscript); or Published version (Version of Record) in an institutional repository of the author's choice.
